11. September 2008 by admin.

Sorry Mr. Roese, but you’ve discovered an already known incontrovertible truth, known for many years, but best summed up as John Gabriel’s Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory.

Posted in Telecoms | Print | No Comments »

27. August 2008 by admin.

Mark Evans of All About Nortel, points out in his latest post that Nortel’s advertising brain-trust are asking employees to generate videos touting the companies “Green” strategy. I wonder if any anonymous videos will be submitted that play up on the concept of “Look how many buildings we have with the heating/cooling/lighting turned off due to lack of employees to fill them”. One needs to only have a recent look at their Carling site in Ottawa, with the almost complete vacancy of the recently added Labs numbered 6 through 9.

Posted in Telecoms | Print | No Comments »

26. August 2008 by admin.

A few stories have appeared recently regarding the practice of throttling traffic. While one of the most egregious offenders (Bell Canada) is right in my own backyard, I’d rather talk about Comcast and Verizon. Obviously, the FCC decision against Comcast on August 1 2008, and the order requiring Comcast disclose the nature of its traffic management are seen as significant victories for ‘Net Neutrality’.I completely applaud the FCC for taking this stance, and I agree that Comcast has acted inappropriately. But… I also largely agree with Verizon CTO Richard Lynch’s comments as cited in this ars technica article. Now, don’t misinterpret my agreement in this case; I believe that not all traffic can be treated equally. But I do not believe that any trafic should be slowed down. Rather, I believe that the access providers like Verizon, Comcast, Bell Canada, etc should be offering stated traffic classes, and adhering very strictly to categorisation of traffic. My opinion is that certain content providers or certain forms of content should be granted a higher traffic categorisation (e.g. expedited forwarding). Traffic such as my stock trading (if I actually had a sufficient amount of money to participate in stock purchases), my health-provider research, and similar content should be prioritised highly. Traffic such as YouTube, and BitTorrent should be prioritised lower, however the content provider and/or the subscriber should have the option to buy a higher traffic class. It’s doubtful one would be able to give their YouTube traffic equal prioritisation to critical Health Care data, but the user and/or provider should be able to buy a higher rating that best effort.In my opinion, this would be a win-win for the access provider, who can meet time-critical data delivery by engineering and segregating their network paths for sufficient  bandwidth for high priority traffic classes. And, they can take a piece of the content providers revenue by taking a piece of premium per-service bandwith subscription. However, to make this work, the access providers need to focus on providing the best possible and most flexible network access, and stop worring about competing with the content providers… Alas, that is unlikely to occur.

Posted in Telecoms | Print | No Comments »

20. August 2008 by admin.

I couldn’t help but notice Mr. Bo Gowan’s post yesterday regarding Gartner’s magic quadrant for corporate telephony. In his post, he notes that Nortel is cited as the leader in completeness of vision, and goes on to quote Mr. Marty Parker and the Gartner publication on how Microsoft is focused on applying communications in a new way, and how Nortel has the best OCS integration.While it’s great that Nortel integrates its commodity (voice) infrastructure with the revenue generating potential of Mocrosoft, I have to wonder how much being King of Commodity adds to Nortel’s bottom line.And of course, regarding Nortel’s completeness of vision, I can only think of the Thomas Edison quote, “Vision without execution is hallucination”.

Posted in Telecoms | Print | No Comments »